Roger Waters, co-founder and longtime creative force behind Pink Floyd, has reiterated that he stands by his past criticisms of Ozzy Osbourne, insisting he “has no regrets” about speaking out — even years after the original remarks. Waters’ recent comments signal that old tensions between rock icons continue to resonate within the music world, and that he isn’t interested in softening his stance for the sake of nostalgia or diplomacy.
In a recent interview, Waters was asked about the backlash he received decades ago after criticizing Osbourne. Rather than backtracking, the former Floyd bassist framed his comments as honest and necessary.
“I have no regrets about what I said,” Waters declared. He noted that speaking one’s truth — even when it’s uncomfortable — is part of being an artist and a public figure. Waters’ position underscores his longstanding belief that musicians should be unafraid to voice their opinions, even when they clash with industry peers.
The controversy stems from remarks Waters made years ago, in which he openly questioned aspects of Ozzy Osbourne’s career and public persona. At the time, Waters’ comments were interpreted by many as dismissive of Osbourne’s contributions to rock and metal, sparking rebuttals from fans and observers in both camps. Whether debating musicianship, commercial success or cultural impact, Waters’ original critique was enough to create a rift in the public eye.
Waters’ refusal to retract his words reflects his larger worldview: that honesty should take precedence over politeness. In his telling, art isn’t just entertainment — it’s a platform for critique, engagement and reflection.
“He wasn’t making the kind of music that I felt was meaningful to me,” Waters explained, indicating that his disagreements with Osbourne come not from personal animosity, but from differing ideas about what music is and what it should do.
Whether or not one agrees with Waters’ assessment, Ozzy Osbourne’s influence on rock and metal is undeniable. From his role as frontman of Black Sabbath to a wildly successful solo career, Osbourne’s work helped define heavy music for generations. His cultural footprint — in sound, image and sheer presence — is vast.
Waters’ critique, then, sits in contrast to the broader consensus that Ozzy is one of rock’s most pivotal figures. This push-and-pull of opinion is part of what makes rock culture dynamic; artists like Waters and Osbourne have shaped musical history in very different ways, and debates about meaning and legacy are almost inevitable.
Roger Waters’ refusal to recant underscores a broader truth about music and criticism: even widely revered artists are not immune to critique from their peers. In Waters’ world, art and opinion are inseparable, and the willingness to speak uncomfortable truths — no matter how controversial — is a core part of his identity.
For fans of both artists, the resurfacing of Waters’ comments offers a chance to reflect on why we value certain musicians, how we interpret legacy, and what criticism means in a culture defined by passionate allegiance.
